ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Investigating complementary and alternative medicine in Norwegian hospitals: a cross-sectional study with process evaluation.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospitals worldwide have expanded their offerings of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in recent years. However, there is a lack of updated data about CAM services offered in Norwegian hospitals. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CAM in Norwegian hospitals and explore how CAM is practiced within these hospitals.
methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods approach, including a cross-sectional survey administered to all Norwegian hospitals (response rate, 74%; n = 215) and a process evaluation with healthcare providers (n = 11) practicing CAM at these hospitals. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and binary logistic regression. Content analysis was employed to analyze the process evaluation data.
resultsMore than half of the hospitals (54%, n = 115) reported offering CAM to patients, and the highest prevalence was reported at clinics for substance abuse (77%, n = 27) and psychiatric hospitals (75% n = 41). Acupuncture (21%, n = 45), expressive art therapy (21%, n = 45), and yoga (21%, n = 45) were the most used modalities. In a process evaluation, four main themes were identified: the incorporation of CAM at hospitals, Reasons for offering CAM at hospitals, Advantages of offering CAM at hospitals, and the Safety of CAM.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that CAM is widely offered in Norwegian hospitals, consistent with previous research. While participants in the process evaluation viewed CAM as a holistic and beneficial approach to care, its adoption remains inconsistent across institutions. This variability, likely due to the lack of defined CAM roles and job descriptions, may pose indirect risks to both healthcare providers and patients. Standardized guidelines are needed to ensure safe and fair implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.