ArticleBMC genomics2026
RePo index: a multidimensional framework to quantify genetic resilience in data-limited amphibian faunas.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the resilience of Chilean amphibians to environmental disturbances through an integrative approach that combines ecological, demographic, bibliometric, and molecular information. A total of 58 species distributed across 14 genera and 9 families were evaluated via the resilience potential (RePo) index, which incorporates eleven criteria grouped into five dimensions: distribution, population trends, emerging diseases, evolutionary history, and genetic records. The results revealed high ecological vulnerability: 83% of the species were classified as non resilient (45% with no resilience and 38% with low resilience), and none reached the high-resilience category. At the family level, Telmatobiidae presented the lowest resilience values, whereas Leptodactylidae presented the highest. At the genus level, Insuetophrynus was identified as the most vulnerable taxon, with no molecular records and an extremely restricted distribution. In contrast, species such as Rhinella spinulosa and Pleurodema thaul presented moderate resilience, suggesting greater adaptive potential and relevance for functional studies. From a bibliometric perspective, a bias toward classical research topics (distribution, physiology, and taxonomy) was detected, with limited representation of integrative approaches such as genetic conservation or climate change. The conceptual modularity in the literature was low (Q = 0.1328), indicating weak thematic differentiation and little integration of omics tools. Most species lack transcriptomic and genomic data, severely limiting the assessment of their adaptive mechanisms. In this context, the RePo index has emerged as an integrative tool useful for operationalizing concepts such as evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) and management units (MUs), which are essential for evidence-based conservation. Finally, this study highlights the need to incorporate high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and to participate in international initiatives, such as the Amphibian Genomics Consortium, as a strategic path forward for advancing adaptive conservation of Chilean amphibians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.