ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Optimizing biomass production and antioxidant dynamics in Ceratophyllum demersum L. using multi-walled carbon nanotubes and machine learning models.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, Integration of Genome-Wide Association Studies and Machine Learning for Antibacterial Trait Analysis in the Mediterranean Spice Laurel (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning and mathematical modeling for comparative analysis of green-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles as seed nano-priming agents for linseed.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro plant culture systems are widely used to investigate biomass production with physiological regulation, and can be benefitted by incorporating novel materials such as nanoparticles. Aquatic macrophytes are highly significant for sustainable biomass production, with optimization remains a major challenge. In this study, the combined impact of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), sucrose (S), and Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt concentrations on plant biomass, pigmentation, and biochemical activities in Ceratophyllum demersum was evaluated. The experiment was designed using Box-Behnken Design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The optimization results were further predicted and validated using machine learning models, specifically the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Random Forest (RF) models, with six performance metrics, and the leave-one-out cross-validation technique. RSM analysis revealed a significant relationship between input parameters (MS basal salts, sucrose, and MWCNTs) and plant responses (growth and physiological traits). Among the testing ML models, the MLP model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for several traits and varied for biochemical traits. Results illustrated the robust predictive capacity with R2 values of 0.99 for oxidative stress markers such as malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide. The integrated RSM-ML framework demonstrated robust predictive capacity of exidative markers and revealed distinct optimal conditions for growth and biochemical traits. The results provide valuable insights for studies conducted under in vitro conditions on how nanomaterials interact with nutritional and carbon sources for optimizing biomass production, physiological responses, and stress regulation in aquatic plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.