ArticleBMC psychology2026
Exploring the relationship between religiosity and coping strategies among individuals with mental illness in Uganda: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and factors associated with suicidality among adolescents with epilepsy attending national referral hospitals in Uganda.Discover mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental illnesses are leading causes of disability worldwide, and individuals often turn to religion as a source of support and resilience. In Uganda, where religious participation is deeply embedded in society, the influence of religiosity on coping strategies among individuals with mental illnesses remains underexplored. This study examined the relationship between religiosity and coping strategies among people with mental illnesses at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in southwestern Uganda.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 adult outpatients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital. Religiosity was assessed using the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), and coping strategies were measured using the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE) scale. Exploratory factor analysis was used to classify coping strategies into positive and negative. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between religiosity dimensions and positive coping while adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical factors.
resultsNegative coping strategies were more prevalent (61.2%) than positive strategies (38.8%). In adjusted analyses, higher organizational religious activity was associated with increased odds of positive coping (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.57), while higher non-organizational religious activity was associated with reduced odds of positive coping (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.81). Family history of mental illness (aOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.26) and a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (aOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.76) were also associated with greater use of positive coping.
conclusionOrganizational religious activity is independently associated with adaptive coping among individuals with mental illness, whereas non-organizational religious activity is linked to reduced likelihood of positive coping. The high reliance on maladaptive coping strategies underscores the need for comprehensive, culturally sensitive mental health interventions that integrate psychosocial and faith-based support. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify causal pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.