Evidence mapPaperPMID 41808240Full record

ArticleBiological research2026

DNA damage and cell death induced by exposure to ultra-high dose rate low-dose pulsed X-rays emitted from a kilojoule plasma focus device.

Héctor Araya, Jalaj Jain, Rodrigo Andaur, José Moreno, Sergio Davis, Pablo Diaz, Ethel Velásquez, Josefa Orellana, Martín Ríos, Jessica Toro and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Héctor Araya *Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Jalaj JainComisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo Andaur *Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
José MorenoComisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Sergio DavisComisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo DiazDepartamento Vigilancia Sanitaria e Investigación, Subdepartamento de Investigación e Innovación, Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Avenida Marathon 1000, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile.
Ethel VelásquezComisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Josefa OrellanaEscuela de Tecnología Médica, Facultad de Medicina - Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Avenida Plaza 680, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Martín RíosEscuela de Tecnología Médica, Facultad de Medicina - Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Avenida Plaza 680, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Jessica ToroDepartamento de Oncología Básico Clínica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Avenida Independencia 1027, Santiago, 8380453, Chile.
Octavio Orellana-SerradellCentro de Investigaciones Nucleares para Aplicaciones en Salud y Biomedicina, Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Cristopher FierroDepartamento de Oncología Básico Clínica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Avenida Independencia 1027, Santiago, 8380453, Chile.
Leopoldo SotoComisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Center for Research and Applications on the Intersection of Plasma Physics, Matter and Complexity (P2mc), Nueva Bilbao 12501, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. leopoldo.soto@cchen.cl.
Katherine MarcelainDepartamento de Oncología Básico Clínica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Avenida Independencia 1027, Santiago, 8380453, Chile. kmarcelain@uchile.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4018-6623

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FONDECYT 1190677, FONDECYT 1221162, FONDECYT 1240375, FONDECYT Iniciación 11230594, FONDECYT Postdoctorado 3190184, FONDECYT Postdoctorado 3190396, PIA Anillo ACT172101, and FONDAP 152220002.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFLASH radiotherapy, characterized by ultra-high dose rates (> 40 Gy/s), potentially spares normal tissues while maintaining antitumor efficacy (the FLASH effect). While electron and proton FLASH are explored, pulsed X-ray sources like plasma focus devices offer unique possibilities. Previous work has reported hyper-radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer cells exposed to ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays from a kilojoule plasma focus (PF) device, without significant effects on non-cancerous cells. This study further investigates the biological effects of ultra-high-dose-rate (~ 10⁷ Gy/min), low-total-dose pulsed X-rays generated by a PF-2 kJ device on colorectal cancer cell lines, focusing on DNA damage, cell cycle progression, and gene expression.

resultsLow-total-dose (~ 0.25 Gy), ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays (0.025 Gy/pulse, a total of 10 pulses, pulses temporally separated by 15–20 s) generated by a PF-2 kJ device induced a significant increase in the SubG1 population in HCT116 and DLD1 cells over 72 h, an effect indicative of apoptosis, which was not observed with conventional X-rays at similar total doses. In addition, pulsed X-rays induced apoptosis in radioresistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Whereas conventional X-rays did not cause a significant increase in double-strand breaks (DSBs), surrogate marker γ-H2AX and phosphor-P53(Ser15) signal were detected 30 min following pulsed X-ray exposure and persisted for up to 24 h, and no evidence of G2/M cell cycle arrest was detected in exposed cells. Gene expression analysis and preliminary transcriptomic data further suggest a DNA damage response leading to cell death and global change in general biological processes related to regulation of gene expression.

conclusionLow-total-dose (~ 0.25 Gy), ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays generated by a PF-2 kJ device induce significant and sustained DNA damage (DSBs) leading to increased apoptosis in colorectal (HCT-116, DLD-1) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, compared to conventional X-rays. These effects, coupled with distinct changes in gene expression, suggest that ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays may overcomeradio-resistancee without eliciting a conventional DNA damage repair or cell cycle checkpoint response. These findings support the potential of PF-generated pulsed X-rays as a novel sourcof e radiotherapy modality and warrant further investigation, particularly in in vivo models, to assess clinical applicability and safety.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell DeathColorectal NeoplasmsDNA DamageCell CycleCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansRadiation ToleranceX-RaysCancerCell deathColorectal cancerDNA damageFLASH radiationPlasma focus device

Identifiers

PMID41808240
PMCPMC13088622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.