Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Impact of different paraspinal muscle mass on the prognosis of ACDF-a finite element analysis.

Haojun Cui, Mengmeng Zhou, Yi Gong, Hongjie Zhang, Tengfei Zhang, Xin Tan, Xusheng Bi, Maosen Zhang, Xuan Wang, Zehua Jiang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haojun Cui *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Mengmeng Zhou *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yi Gong *Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hongjie ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Dehong/Kunming Medical University Affiliated Dehong Hospital, Mangshi, China.
Tengfei ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xin TanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xusheng BiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Maosen ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xuan WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Zehua JiangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Rusen ZhuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common degenerative disease of the cervical spine, for which anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) serves as an effective surgical treatment. Recent studies have suggested that the quality of the paraspinal muscles, particularly the multifidus muscle, is closely related to postoperative outcomes; However, biomechanical evidence remains limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the biomechanical impact of varying paraspinal muscle mass on the cervical spine following ACDF. Methods: A finite element model of the cervical spine, including vertebrae, intervertebral discs, ligaments, and implants (cage and screws), was developed based on CT data from a healthy volunteer. Three models simulating different postoperative states of the multifidus muscle were constructed: a postoperative muscle training model (120% muscle quality), a postoperative muscle atrophy model (80% muscle quality), and a control model (100% muscle quality). Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotational loads were applied to each model to analyze changes in adjacent segment disc pressure, implant stress distribution, capsular ligament stress, and range of motion (ROM). Results: In the finite element models of different muscle quality groups after ACDF, the muscle atrophy model (80% muscle quality) showed a general increase in the intervertebral disc pressure of adjacent segments, especially during flexion-extension movements, which indicates an elevated risk of degeneration. Meanwhile, the stress values of implants such as cages and screws were increased, with more significant elevation observed during flexion and rotation. The capsular ligament stress was also elevated in the muscle atrophy model, and load overload was prone to occur during extension and rotation. In addition, muscle atrophy could lead to an increase in the ROM of adjacent segments. In contrast, all biomechanical indices of the muscle exercise model (120% muscle quality) were superior to those of the normal model. Conclusion: Paraspinal muscle quality is a critical factor influencing biomechanical stability after ACDF. Muscle atrophy may increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and implant failure, while muscle strengthening contributes to enhancing postoperative stability. These results support that preoperative evaluation of paraspinal muscle status and targeted postoperative muscle strength training hold significant clinical implications for improving surgical prognosis.

Indexed as

ACDFcervical spondylotic myelopathyfinite element analysisparaspinal musclespostoperative cervical spine

Identifiers

PMID41808768
PMCPMC12968279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.