Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808770›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

From anonymity to stardom: history of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in humans.

Surendra Kumar Sharma, Vishwanath Upadhyay, Alladi Mohan

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Surendra Kumar Sharma *Faculty of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Vishwanath Upadhyay *Senior Scientist Fellow, National Academy of Sciences, India (NASI), Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Alladi MohanDepartment of Medicine, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) were not considered as human pathogens. Their nomenclature has evolved over several years, until 1971 when finally named as NTM, which is universally accepted now. Because of continuously evolving diagnostic methods, several new species/subspecies of NTM were identified. Presently, nearly 200 NTM species have been reported. Similar to tuberculosis (TB), NTM are known to involve both pulmonary and extrapulmonary organs. Diagnosis of NTM disease is quite cumbersome and is primarily based on their growth characteristics on solid and liquid cultures. Biochemical testing was the mainstay of NTM diagnosis and species identification in the past, which was often erroneous. Recently, molecular tests like line probe assay, targeted, and whole genome sequencing have become available for rapid and accurate diagnosis. Isolation and identification of NTM species/subspecies alone do not warrant treatment. After ascertaining clinical relevance, virulence of NTM species, and evidence for clinical and radiological progression, the decision to administer treatment is taken. Multiple drugs are often administered for 12 months after sputum culture conversion, except in

Indexed as

Mycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousNontuberculous MycobacteriaHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansemerging respiratory pathogensMycobacterium abscessus complexMycobacterium avium complex (MAC)Mycobacterium kansasiinontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)NTM disease historypulmonary and extrapulmonary NTM disease

Identifiers

PMID41808770
PMCPMC12968181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.