SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Natural compounds as multitarget agents in Alzheimer's diseases: evidence from
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the BACE1-GSK-3β Signaling Axis in Alzheimer's Disease: From Molecular Crosstalk to Nanotechnology-Based Translational Strategies.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Remodeling of the mitochondrial quality control network: natural products intervening in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of natural compounds in treating inhalation anesthesia-induced cognitive dysfunction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- PCSK9-Mediated Inflammation in Foam Cell Formation and Exploring the Biologically Active Compounds Derived From Natural Resources.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is marked by a gradual decline in cognitive function driven by amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, synaptic failure, neuroinflammatory responses, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Despite extensive research efforts, currently available pharmacological treatments provide only limited symptomatic relief and do not prevent disease progression. These shortcomings have fuelled growing interest in natural compounds, which possess pleiotropic biological properties and may more effectively target the multifaceted pathology of AD. Methods: This systematic review was performed in compliance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect to identify preclinical and clinical studies examining the effects of natural compounds in Results: A total of 41 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 25 Conclusion: Overall, the available evidence suggests that natural compounds confer multitarget neuroprotective effects that directly engage with key pathological mechanisms underlying AD. Nonetheless, significant translational challenges remain, particularly with respect to bioavailability, compound standardisation, and clinical efficacy. Further robust, well-controlled clinical trials are essential to establish the therapeutic value of these agents as potential disease-modifying interventions for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.