ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
The Paradox of Stunting: Differences in the Perception of Health Workers in Community Health Centers and Experts in Hospitals on Low Birth Weight and Stunting Data.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify differences in the perception of health workers in Community Health Centers (CHCs) and hospital experts regarding Low Birth Weight (LBW) and Stunting, derived from community-based nutrition reporting (e-CBNRR). Methods: The design was mixed-methods. Quantitative data uses secondary data from e-CBNRR for the years 2020 to 2024. Starting in 2022, LBW data are collected retrospectively through 2020 and prospectively through 2024 for subjects who meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 715 subject data were obtained. This consists of 287 LBW and 428 non-LBW in 141 sub-districts. Quantitative results were then used for qualitative exploration. Qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed thematically. Results: Stunting at birth in the LBW and non-LBW groups reached 40.30% and 10.60%, respectively. Stunting in the LBW group decreased to 14.30% at 6 months of age. In contrast, the stunting rate rose again, reaching 51.20% at 48 months in the non-LBW group, which was higher than in the LBW group (49.30%). Health workers (HW) at CHC have never conducted advanced data analysis from e-CBNRR. HCWs fail to understand the relationship between the available data and the interventions needed for LBW and stunting cases. Conclusion: LBW babies suffered from stunting 4 times higher than that of the Non-LBW group. The stunting can decline during the breastfeeding period, especially in the LBW group. Ironically, it increased again as the children grew in both groups. Health workers' perceptions of stunting and LBW information differ between health workers in CHC and experts in secondary health services. e-CBNRR data can be used to dig deeper into valuable information and develop appropriate interventions for stunting and LBW cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.