Evidence mapPaperPMID 41808956Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2026

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Cardiogenic Shock.

Hideki Kitahara, Kaoru Matsuura, Goro Matsumiya, Yoshio Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hideki KitaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Kaoru MatsuuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Goro MatsumiyaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) caused by severe aortic stenosis (AS) is an archetype of supply-demand mismatch in which increased left ventricular afterload, impaired coronary perfusion, and concentric hypertrophy, combine to cause multiorgan hypoperfusion. Early relief of valvular obstruction through emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or, in selected cases, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as bridge therapy, can be life-saving. Although emergency TAVR demonstrates acceptable procedural success rates and survival compared with BAV alone, short-term mortality remains high due to shock severity, comorbidities, use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and procedural and logistical challenges. This review outlines current hemodynamic phenotypes of CS, a streamlined door-to-valve pathway, appropriate use of MCS, a framework for selecting emergency TAVR or BAV bridging, procedural management tailored to shock physiology, and predictors of clinical outcomes, providing evidence-based guidance to optimize rescue therapy in AS patients with CS.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisCardiogenic shockTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID41808956
PMCPMC12971215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.