ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2026
A novel methodology for localizing pallidal deep brain stimulation leads.
Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Positioning of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads is paramount for optimizing therapeutic efficacy in Parkinson's disease (PD) and dystonia. Quantitative determination of lead position remains essential; however, current atlas-based targeting and stereotactic coordinate methods, while informative, limit patient specificity afforded by high-resolution reconstruction and introduce subjective variability. Methods: We developed a novel pipeline in Unity™ to ingest 7T MRI-based reconstructions of DBS leads within the globus pallidus internus (GPi). Using anatomical landmarks and structure-specific algorithms, the GPi was parcellated into 12 anatomically-based subregions in a semi-automated, reproducible manner. Active contact positions were localized relative to a novel coordinate system developed from a GPi-based bounding box. A novel distance-to-border metric remapped contacts onto a common atlas (PD25) for population comparison against the same contacts mapped onto a common left GPi space using mid-commissural point (MCP) coordinates (Schaltenbrand-Wahren atlas). Results: Fifteen leads from 10 PD subjects were used for ellipsoid fitting of active contact locations, resulting in an elliptical volume of 38.94 mm Conclusion: Our novel software provides a quantifiable lead location with respect to the anatomical target, enhancing patient-specific lead localization by avoiding some of the pitfalls of either structure-to-atlas normalization or traditional stereotactic coordinates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.