ReviewWorld journal of methodology2026
Adolescent varicocele, a Gordian knot: A comprehensive review of clinical perspectives and future directions.
Review in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The abnormal dilatation of the spermatic veins, or varicocele, affects 14%-20% of teenagers, a proportion similar to that of adults, which peaks in late adolescence (15-19 years old). It is more common in metropolitan and developed areas, possibly due to increased access to medical attention and diagnostic resources. Treatment myths and beliefs about adolescent varicocele (AV) persist, making it a highly disputable condition to address. Concerns include whether surgical intervention is necessary for teenage varicocele and whether it enhances seminal parameters after varicocelectomy. Inadequate or delayed management may contribute to future infertility, imposing a significant public health and economic burden due to the costs associated with assisted reproductive technologies and psychosocial impacts. This minireview addresses common misconceptions about teenage varicocele and clarifies the clinical assessment, treatment, and long-term effects of varicocele in adolescents. This minireview examines and provides information on essential topics, including etiopathogenesis, evaluation, and groups of patients at risk of infertility, emphasizing the importance of testicular volume asymmetry (greater than 20%) and semen parameters in predicting future subfertility. Principles of management, indications, and choice of intervention (follow-up, surgical, and adjunctive treatment) are explored, along with treatment outcomes, to address this challenging situation. A balance between intervention and cautious follow-up is emphasized in the evidence-based suggestions for treatment strategies, which depend on the clinical examination, scrotal Doppler, and semen parameter findings. Based on testicular asymmetry, semen parameters, and symptomatology, management strategies range from conservative surveillance to surgical varicocelectomy and minimally invasive procedures like embolization. AV is a complex condition. If untreated, it can cause oligospermia, infertility, and irreparable testicular damage. Timely intervention, such as subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy, is essential after an early diagnosis is made by clinical examination supported by Doppler ultrasound and semen analysis for symptomatic, bilateral palpable, or asymptomatic unilateral varicoceles with testicular asymmetry greater than 20% and abnormal semen parameters in Tanner V boys. Long-term data indicate that patients who have had surgery have better testicular growth and semen characteristics; nevertheless, the effect on future fertility is still being studied, indicating the need for individualized treatment plans. Testicular health, with preserved reproductive potential, is maintained through proactive evaluation and care. AV can affect quality of life in addition to causing physical discomfort; worries about fertility, body image, and social stigma call for comprehensive, patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.