ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026
Tai Chi for treating cancer-related fatigue: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer-related fatigue (CRF) lacks effective pharmacological treatment, with the available options in Western medicine often having limited efficacy and adverse effects. Tai Chi, a traditional Chinese exercise, shows promise in improving CRF.
aimTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of Tai Chi in alleviating CRF.
methodsIn this meta-analysis, we reviewed 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and published before March 31, 2025. The experimental groups received conventional treatment plus Tai Chi, and the control groups received conventional treatment only, with varying durations. Using random-effects models, we calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess the effects of CRF. Heterogeneity was evaluated through
resultsThis study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (
conclusionResults analysis based on the GRADE assessment indicated that Tai Chi significantly alleviated fatigue symptoms in cancer patients (moderate-certainty evidence, SMD = -1.29, 95%CI: -1.72 to -0.85,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.