Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809198›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026

The Lithuanian multiple sclerosis registry: current framework and quality challenges.

Julija Isačenko, Dalia Musneckienė, Rasa Kizlaitienė, Nataša Giedraitienė, Romualdas Kizlaitis, Lina Malcienė, Dalius Jatužis, Gintaras Kaubrys, Daiva Rastenytė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julija IsačenkoDepartment of Neurology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Dalia MusneckienėDepartment of Neurology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Rasa KizlaitienėClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Nataša GiedraitienėClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Romualdas KizlaitisIndependent Researcher, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Lina MalcienėDepartment of Neural Diseases and Rehabilitation, Klaipeda University Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Dalius JatužisClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gintaras KaubrysClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Daiva RastenytėDepartment of Neurology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This article presents the current structure, data collection methods, coverage, and limitations of the Lithuanian Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Registry. Materials and methods: The Lithuanian MS Registry, established by the Lithuanian Neurologists' Association, began its activities in 2013. All three national centers providing MS treatment in Lithuania have secure access to their respective patient data and can enter new clinical information into the registry. Adult individuals with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of MS who receive care in Lithuania and provide written informed consent are eligible for inclusion in the Multiple Sclerosis Patient Surveillance System registry. For the present analysis, a dataset comprising all records from February 1, 2013, to January 1, 2024, was extracted on June 17, 2024. Results: The registry collects individual data on demographics, results from specific diagnostic procedures (such as cerebrospinal fluid analysis, evoked potentials), clinical evaluations conducted at every visit (based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale), treatment, and relapses (including their dates and whether corticosteroid treatment was administered). Currently, the registry includes 2,923 patients. Of these, 1,651 patients are classified as in active follow-up (those with at least one recorded visit since January 1, 2021) and represent less than half of the total MS population in Lithuania (47.3%). The registry covers approximately 69.5%-74.6% of all patients receiving disease-modifying therapy in the country. Conclusion: Although the registry has been operating for more than a decade, challenges remain in patient enrollment and ensuring high-quality data collection. Strengthening validation processes is essential to ensure the registry's reliability and utility in both clinical practice and research settings.

Indexed as

epidemiologyLithuaniamultiple sclerosisreal-world dataregistries

Identifiers

PMID41809198
PMCPMC12967925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.