ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
The Lithuanian multiple sclerosis registry: current framework and quality challenges.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This article presents the current structure, data collection methods, coverage, and limitations of the Lithuanian Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Registry. Materials and methods: The Lithuanian MS Registry, established by the Lithuanian Neurologists' Association, began its activities in 2013. All three national centers providing MS treatment in Lithuania have secure access to their respective patient data and can enter new clinical information into the registry. Adult individuals with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of MS who receive care in Lithuania and provide written informed consent are eligible for inclusion in the Multiple Sclerosis Patient Surveillance System registry. For the present analysis, a dataset comprising all records from February 1, 2013, to January 1, 2024, was extracted on June 17, 2024. Results: The registry collects individual data on demographics, results from specific diagnostic procedures (such as cerebrospinal fluid analysis, evoked potentials), clinical evaluations conducted at every visit (based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale), treatment, and relapses (including their dates and whether corticosteroid treatment was administered). Currently, the registry includes 2,923 patients. Of these, 1,651 patients are classified as in active follow-up (those with at least one recorded visit since January 1, 2021) and represent less than half of the total MS population in Lithuania (47.3%). The registry covers approximately 69.5%-74.6% of all patients receiving disease-modifying therapy in the country. Conclusion: Although the registry has been operating for more than a decade, challenges remain in patient enrollment and ensuring high-quality data collection. Strengthening validation processes is essential to ensure the registry's reliability and utility in both clinical practice and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.