ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Present research and emerging trends in neurogenic bladder research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis (2015-2025).
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical significance of neurogenic bladder (NB) has gained growing attention in recent years, attracting substantial scholarly interest. This study systematically examines collaborative research networks, evaluates emerging trends, identifies current research priorities, and projects future directions in the field of NB. Methods: A systematic search of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was performed to identify relevant studies on NB published between January 2015 and June 2025. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace to visualize and compare contributions across countries, institutions, journals, references, and keywords. Results: The final analysis incorporated 4,180 publications, demonstrating a consistent upward trend in annual research output. The USA and the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP) were the top publishing countries and institutions, with 1,314 and 151 papers, respectively. " Conclusions: NB research demonstrates rapid development, yet high-quality outcomes remain scarce. Current studies primarily focus on fundamental mechanisms and technological innovation, with urgent needs to enhance clinical translation and patient-centered outcomes. Future strategies should prioritize resource optimization and multidisciplinary collaboration to accelerate translational breakthroughs while reinforcing patient-centric research frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.