ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2026
Ejaculatory frequency and male fertility: a literature review of evidence-based recommendations.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Ejaculatory frequency is a modifiable behavioral factor known to influence semen quality and male fertility. While abstinence may increase semen volume and total sperm count, extended intervals can impair sperm motility and DNA integrity. The optimal abstinence duration for natural conception and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) remains under active investigation. This literature review evaluates the impact of ejaculatory frequency and abstinence length on key sperm parameters and fertility outcomes and aims to inform evidence-based guidance recommendations for men actively attempting conception. Methods: A structured literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they evaluated men of reproductive age, compared varying ejaculatory frequencies or abstinence intervals, and reported semen parameters or fertility outcomes. Data were synthesized thematically across four domains: (I) semen volume and count; (II) motility and viability; (III) DNA fragmentation; and (IV) fertility outcomes including pregnancy and live birth rates. Key Content and Findings: Prolonged abstinence (≥4 to 7 days) increased semen volume and sperm count but was associated with reduced motility and higher DNA fragmentation. Shorter abstinence (≤2 days), including daily ejaculation, yielded fresher sperm with superior motility and DNA integrity, particularly among subfertile men. Clinical studies demonstrated equivalent or improved pregnancy rates with shorter abstinence intervals across natural conception, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Conclusions: Frequent ejaculation-defined as shorter abstinence intervals-is associated with improved sperm function and may enhance fertility outcomes. While individualized approaches are warranted, current evidence supports ejaculation every 1 to 2 days for men attempting conception. Future guidelines should reconsider traditional abstinence recommendations to reflect these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.