ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Screening children and adolescents for cutaneous malignant melanoma: the impossible trade-off between life-years saved and unnecessary biopsies.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Europe, insufficient data exist to assess the magnitude and results of screening practice for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) among children and adolescents. In this population-based study covering part of the Emilia-Romagna Region (northern Italy), multiple indicators of screening for CMM by patient age were evaluated. Methods: The current population of the study area is over 2,600,000. The records of patients with CMM (2003-2017) were extracted from the Emilia-Romagna Cancer Registry. The records of dermatologic office visits and skin biopsies were downloaded from the outpatient healthcare database of the Regional Administration. Patient age was grouped as 0-19 (children and adolescents), 20-39, 40-59, 60-79, and ≥80 years. The study endpoints were in situ/invasive CMM incidence rate, Breslow tumor thickness distribution, mortality rate, dermatologic office visit rate, skin biopsy rate, number (of patients) needed to visit (NNV) and biopsy (NNB) to detect a case of disease, and the potential number of life-years saved, equivalent to the number of years of life expectancy left at diagnosis. Results: Data for 11,679 patients, 4,593,988 dermatologic office visits and 849,343 skin biopsies were obtained. Patients aged 0-19 years (n=51) accounted for 0.4% of total incident CMM cases, 0.3% of total deaths from CMM, and 1.4% of total potential number of life-years saved. The annual dermatologic office visit rate at age 0-19 years was 9.2%. The NNV was 11,362.2 at age 0-19 years versus 305.6 in the middle-aged group of 40-59 years (ratio, 37.2). The NNB was 681.5 and 66.4, respectively (ratio, 10.3). The total potential number of life-years saved was 2939.9 versus 98,382.2, respectively (ratio, 0.03). Conclusion: When screening children and adolescents for CMM, a trade-off between life-years saved and unnecessary biopsies is impossible to make because of the minimal prevalence and the ill-defined clinical/dermoscopic features of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.