Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809874›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2026

Progression after endoscopic treatment for type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center retrospective study.

Ze-Liang Yang, Hui-Ke Wang, Yong Liu, Li-Zhou Dou, Yue-Ming Zhang, Hoi-Ioi Ng, Shun He, Yihe-Bali Chi, Gui-Qi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ze-Liang YangDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Hui-Ke WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Li-Zhou DouDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yue-Ming ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Hoi-Ioi NgDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Shun HeDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yihe-Bali ChiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Gui-Qi WangDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China. wangguiq@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic treatment is the primary therapy for type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs), but it may not address the underlying pathogenesis, increasing the risk of progression.

aimTo investigate the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment and identify progression risk factors.

methodsThis retrospective study involved 128 patients with type I G-NETs treated between January 2009 and May 2024. The patients were categorized into non-progressive (

resultsThe baseline characteristics analysis showed no significant differences between the groups. The median follow-up time was 25.5 months (14.00-58.50 months). The univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that endoscopic treatment combined with adjuvant somatostatin analogs (SSAs) was associated with a lower risk of progression (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.90,

conclusionCombining endoscopic treatment with SSAs is effective for managing type I G-NETs. SSAs and NLR were identified as independent prognostic factors, highlighting their potential to reduce recurrence risk and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

GastroscopyNeuroendocrine TumorsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPrognosisSomatostatinEndoscopic treatmentNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPrognosisSomatostatin analoguesType I gastric neuroendocrine tumors

Identifiers

PMID41809874
PMCPMC12968573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.