Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41809975›Full record

ReviewBMJ medicine2026

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Mark Mahon, Amanda B Muir, Kristle Lynch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark MahonThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amanda B MuirDivision of Gastroenterology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kristle LynchPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic, immune mediated condition characterised by infiltration of eosinophils across the oesophageal mucosa and progressive oesophageal dysfunction. This specialist review explores the changes in understanding of eosinophilic oesophagitis across epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. It highlights the interplay of genetic susceptibility, early life environmental exposures, and immune responses driven by type 2 helper T cells that underpin epithelial barrier dysfunction and fibrostenotic progression. Current diagnostic strategies rely on endoscopic biopsy, but emerging minimally invasive tests (including the oesophageal string test and transnasal endoscopy) offer promising alternatives for disease monitoring. Therapeutic approaches include dietary elimination, drug treatments (eg, proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids), biologics (particularly dupilumab), and endoscopic dilation for fibrostenotic complications. Evidence from landmark trials and guidelines to support phenotype driven, patient centred management are also reviewed. As eosinophilic oesophagitis prevalence continues to rise globally, recent advances in targeted treatments and diagnostics are redefining long term care.

Indexed as

Esophageal motility disordersGastroenterologyGastroesophageal reflux

Identifiers

PMID41809975
PMCPMC12970128

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.