Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Study Protocol: Connecting older adults through multi-level programmes for alleviating loneliness in Hong Kong older adults (COMPASS-HOA).

Vivien Foong Yee Tang, Da Jiang, Jojo Yan Yan Kwok, Henry C Y Ho, Izzy Yi Jian, Namkee G Choi, Tegan Cruwys, Joyce Hoi Sze You, Lisa M Warner, Noëmi Seewer and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07123064 (Alleviating Loneliness in Older Adults Living in Poverty), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07123064 narecruitingnot on this map

Alleviating Loneliness in Older Adults Living in Poverty: A Multi-level Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorEducation University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2029Enrolled1,344ConditionsLoneliness, PovertyArmsIndividual Level, Interpersonal Level, Community Level, Education Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vivien Foong Yee TangDepartment of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Da JiangDepartment of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jojo Yan Yan KwokSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Henry C Y HoDepartment of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Izzy Yi JianDepartment of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Namkee G ChoiSchool of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Tegan CruwysSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Joyce Hoi Sze YouSchool of Pharmacy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lisa M WarnerDepartment of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Noëmi SeewerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Xue BaiDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Anton KällDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tobias KriegerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kee Lee ChouDepartment of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Loneliness is a widespread global issue among older adults that negatively impacts physical and mental health, cognitive functioning, quality of life, and longevity, while also burdening society with healthcare costs. Resulting from factors at individual, interpersonal, and community levels. Multi-level interventions targeting these levels show promise in addressing this complex issue. Objective: This trial aims to develop, implement, and evaluate a multi-level intervention comprising individual-, interpersonal-, and community-level components to reduce loneliness and enhance well-being among older adults in Hong Kong. Methods: This pragmatic, assessor-blinded, 4-arm cluster randomized controlled trial will evaluate a multi-level intervention among 1,344 community-dwelling lonely older adults living in poverty. Participants will be randomized equally to one of the four 6-month intervention groups delivered by trained volunteers: individual-level only, individual- + interpersonal-level, and individual- + interpersonal- + community-level interventions against an education-only control group. Data will be collected at six time points: baseline; 2, 4, and 6 months post baseline; and 12 and 24 months after intervention completion. Primary outcome is assessed by the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Secondary outcomes include De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, symptoms of anxiety and depression, perceived stress, life satisfaction, psychological well-being and sleep quality. Potential mediators will be assessed by mindfulness, self-compassion, emotion regulation, perceived social support, social network characteristics, and neighbourhood collective efficacy and identification. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, employing linear mixed-effects models, regression, mediation, and cost-effectiveness. Qualitative data collected via focus group discussions will be analysed thematically to gain deeper insight into participants' experiences and perceptions of the different interventions. Results: This study will last for 4 years, starting from June 2025 to May 2029. Recruitment and enrolment will begin in March 2026. Data collection will commence in April 2026, followed by the start of intervention delivery. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study globally to implement a multi-level intervention targeting older adults experiencing loneliness and poverty. If proven effective, the multi-level intervention will establish a foundation for community-wide implementation, providing a timely, affordable, and scalable approach that leverages community social capital. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT07123064.

Indexed as

LonelinessAgedFemaleHong KongHumansMalePovertyPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial Supportcluster randomized controlled trialcognitive behavioral treatmentGroups 4 Healthlonelinessmindfulnessmulti-level interventionneighbours every day

Identifiers

PMID41810289
PMCPMC12968008

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.