ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Management of venous thrombosis in sickle cell disease: a comparative study on the use of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and often leads to mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the management of patients with SCD and first venous thrombosis. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with SCD who developed their first episode of venous thrombotic event. Recurrent thrombosis and bleeding were compared between patients treated with DOACs and warfarin. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21. Results: We included 99 patients, of whom 67 (67.7%) were treated with DOACs and 32 (32.3%) with warfarin. The median follow-up time was 44 (1-130) months. Pulmonary embolism was the most common type of thrombosis observed in 64 patients (64.6 %). Three patients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism within 6 months of the first episode, whereas 6 patients developed recurrent thrombosis after 1 year. No significant difference was noted among patients on either type of anticoagulation in terms of major bleeding episodes (OR = 1.1; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8; Conclusion: DOACs are associated with similar clinical outcomes and fewer bleeding complications as compared to warfarin in the management of patients with SCD and thrombosis. Randomized controlled trials are required to further confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.