Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41810336›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026

Management of venous thrombosis in sickle cell disease: a comparative study on the use of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin.

Mosaad Almegren, Eysa N AlSolamy, Rayan A Qutob, Mohammed M Alasmari, Ali Aljeraiwi, Noura Aljuwaisri, Turki Abdulaziz Alshuaibi, Faisal Bahammam, Bader Al Rawahi, Hoor Hamed Al Farsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mosaad AlmegrenDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia.
Eysa N AlSolamyDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan A QutobDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed M AlasmariDepartment of Medicine, King Fahad Armed Forces, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AljeraiwiDepartment of Medicine, Farwaniya and Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital, Farwaniya Area, Kuwait.
Noura AljuwaisriDepartment of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Turki Abdulaziz AlshuaibiDepartment of Medicine, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal BahammamDepartment of Medicine, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Bader Al RawahiDepartment of Medicine, National Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Center, University Medical City, Sultan Qaboos University, Seeb, Oman.
Hoor Hamed Al FarsiDepartment of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and often leads to mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the management of patients with SCD and first venous thrombosis. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with SCD who developed their first episode of venous thrombotic event. Recurrent thrombosis and bleeding were compared between patients treated with DOACs and warfarin. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21. Results: We included 99 patients, of whom 67 (67.7%) were treated with DOACs and 32 (32.3%) with warfarin. The median follow-up time was 44 (1-130) months. Pulmonary embolism was the most common type of thrombosis observed in 64 patients (64.6 %). Three patients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism within 6 months of the first episode, whereas 6 patients developed recurrent thrombosis after 1 year. No significant difference was noted among patients on either type of anticoagulation in terms of major bleeding episodes (OR = 1.1; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8; Conclusion: DOACs are associated with similar clinical outcomes and fewer bleeding complications as compared to warfarin in the management of patients with SCD and thrombosis. Randomized controlled trials are required to further confirm our findings.

Indexed as

bleedingdirect oral anticoagulantssickle cell diseasevenous thromboembolismwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID41810336
PMCPMC12969728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.