ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Evaluating the Impact of National Essential Public Health Services Program Coverage on Hypertension Management, Medical Care Utilization and Household Socioeconomic Well-Being.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Launched in 2009, China's National Essential Public Health Services Program (NEPHSP) has been broadly implemented throughout the country. However, rigorous evaluations of its impact on chronic disease outcomes remain limited. Hypertension, being one of the major noncommunicable diseases targeted by the program, provides an important case study for assessing its effectiveness. Methods: We used longitudinal data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) from 2011 to 2018 to evaluate the impact of receiving NEPHSP-covered services (from 2015 onward) on hypertension management. A difference-in-difference approach with two-way fixed effects was used on a cohort of 774 hypertensive adults to estimate changes in health and socioeconomic outcomes associated with NEPHSP coverage. Results: NEPHSP participation contributed to significant increases in hypertension control (9.8%; 95% CI: 2.7-16.9%; p<0.01) and treatment rates (9.9%; 95% CI: 3.8-16.1%; p<0.01). It also increased inpatient admissions by 0.17 per year (95% CI: 0.03-0.31; p<0.05). No significant effect was found on outpatient visits. In addition to clinical benefits, involvement in NEPHSP was linked to a 5.4% reduction in the Engel coefficient (95% CI: 1.2-9.6%; p<0.05), indicating improved household economic well-being. These impacts were more pronounced among younger adults and urban residents, highlighting disparities across subpopulations. Conclusion: The findings provide evidence that NEPHSP has improved hypertension management and household economic well-being. To further maximize these gains, future policy refinements should focus on adapting services to the specific needs of older age groups and other less-responsive subpopulations to ensure universal health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.