Evidence mapPaperPMID 41810871Full record

ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2026

Retention versus replacement or removal of catheters for people with confirmed or suspected intravascular catheter-related infections.

Junichi Izawa, Nick Daneman, Neill Kj Adhikari, Robert Fowler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junichi IzawaDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1920-8218
Nick DanemanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Neill Kj AdhikariDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Robert FowlerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of catheter retention (or delayed removal after an initial catheter retention strategy) compared to prompt catheter replacement or removal in people of all ages with a short- or long-term central venous catheter or any arterial catheter, and either (i) catheter-related or -associated infection, (ii) bloodstream infection from an uncertain source or (iii) sepsis from an uncertain source.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Venous CathetersDevice RemovalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41810871
PMCPMC12977951

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.