ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Comparative Liquid Biopsy Testing for KRAS Mutations From Plasma Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) and Extracellular Vesicles in Lung Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive tool to detect cancer biomarkers. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are secreted into biofluids to transport cargo such as DNA and are a potential biosource for liquid biopsy biomarkers. To determine the optimal use of liquid biopsy for diagnosing mutations in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), we compared the KRAS mutation status in DNA isolated from four different plasma fractions, including EVs.
methodsPlasma was collected from 58 participants diagnosed with LUAD (early-stage (I, II), n = 30; late-stage (IIIB, IV), n = 28) with known KRAS mutation (KRASmt) or wild-type KRAS (KRASwt). Three distinct plasma-derived fractions were prepared by sequential differential ultracentrifugation aiming to isolate EVs (pellets 1, 2, 3 (P1-P3)). These were tested together with the corresponding plasma supernatant (SUP) for the presence of KRAS G12/G13 mutations by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).
resultsIn early-stage KRASmt LUAD, mutations were detected by ddPCR in only 1 of 15 processed plasma supernatant samples and 1 of 15 P3 samples, but not in any P1 or P2 pellets. In late-stage KRASmt LUAD, mutations were detected in 13/14 of SUP samples, but only in a small fraction of the pellet preparations: P1 (0/14), P2 (2/14) and P3 (2/13) samples.
conclusionWe conclude that ddPCR testing of plasma supernatant achieved high overall agreement with tumour KRASmt status. There was varying abundance of KRAS detected in the plasma fractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.