Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41811538›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2026

Past, Present and Future of Regenerative Gene Therapy for Ischemic Heart Failure.

Laura Florit Gonzalez, Mara Bouwman, Jeroen Bakkers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura Florit Gonzalez *Hubrecht Institute of Developmental Biology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mara Bouwman *Hubrecht Institute of Developmental Biology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen BakkersHubrecht Institute of Developmental Biology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.bakkers@hubrecht.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-9418-0422

Funding

Netherlands Heart Institute CVON2019-2 OUTREACH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in heart failure management, current therapies largely focus on symptom relief and slowing disease progression, without reversing or preventing the underlying condition. As cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of mortality, developing curative treatments is an urgent goal. Advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of heart failure, alongside insights into pathways that drive cardiac regeneration have opened new avenues for gene therapies aimed at restoring cardiac function. While several gene therapy candidates have advanced to clinical trials, their outcomes have been inconsistent, underscoring the challenge to translating preclinical success into clinical efficacy. In this review, we examine the current landscape of gene therapy strategies for ischemic heart failure, emphasize the importance of robust preclinical models in bridging the gap from bench to bedside, and highlight emerging regenerative approaches that aim to repair damaged myocardium and restore cardiac function.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyHeart FailureMyocardial IschemiaMyocardiumRegenerationRegenerative MedicineAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalForecastingGene Therapy AgentsHumansRecovery of FunctionTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment OutcomeCardiac regenerationCardiovascular diseaseGene therapyIschemic heart failureMyocardial repairPreclinical modelsRegenerative medicineTranslational research

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.