ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Relationship Status and Quality Associations with HIV Care Cascade Outcomes Among Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV in the US: Indications of a Dyadic Coping Paradox.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dyadic coping among sexual minority men (SMM) has been a focus of HIV prevention research for decades, but few studies have examined relationship quality as a covariate of HIV care cascade outcomes (ART adherence and an undetectable viral load (VL)). This study utilized a 5-category relationship status variable (single; non-monogamous, sero-discordant; non-monogamous, sero-concordant; monogamous, sero-discordant; monogamous, sero-concordant) to test the hypothesis that relationship quality would moderate associations between relationship status and HIV care outcomes. Adult SMM living with HIV (LWHIV) (n = 1389), recruited via social networking applications between January and December 2021, completed a cross-sectional, online survey. At average levels of relationship quality, only non-monogamous SMM with sero-discordant partners were more likely to be adherent to ART (OR = 3.064, p<.001) and have an undetectable VL (OR = 2.595, p<.001) compared to single SMM. Among non-monogamous SMM with sero-discordant partners, relationship quality was positively associated with ART adherence (OR = 1.065, p<.001) and having an undetectable VL (OR = 1.046, p=.003). Among monogamous SMM with sero-concordant partners, the effect of relationship quality on ART adherence (OR=0.855, p=.007) and having an undetectable VL (OR=0.909, p=.011) was significantly smaller compared to non-monogamous SMM with sero-discordant partners. Among non-monogamous SMM with sero-concordant partners, the effect of relationship quality on ART adherence (OR=0.956, p=.039) was also significantly smaller compared to non-monogamous SMM with sero-discordant partners. Results suggest non-monogamous SMM with sero-discordant partners in high-quality relationships may experience the greatest motivation to engage in HIV care. Messages enhancing motivation for care engagement to improve individual health for SMM LWHIV may augment treatment as prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.