ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Heart failure evidence update 2026.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes and a history of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Dapagliflozin Augmentation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure Following PCI-Treated Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targets.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interval since the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines and 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America (AHA/ACC/HFSA) Guidelines publications has witnessed an unprecedented volume of evidence that substantially expands the therapeutic landscape across the entire ejection fraction (EF) spectrum. Major developments include the emergence of non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and incretin-based therapies for heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced and preserved EF, the validation of rapid guideline-directed medical therapy optimization strategies in acute HF, and new evidence supporting digitalis glycosides in HF patients with reduced EF. Device-based care has evolved with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for valvular heart disease. These data are likely to reshape contemporary clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.