ArticleGeroScience2026
Associations of adherence to the EAT-Lancet and plant-based diets with mortality and life expectancy: two nationwide cohort studies.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EAT-Lancet diet (ELD) and plant-based diets (PBDs) are recommended for their potential health and environmental benefits, but comparative analyses of these dietary patterns in relation to mortality risk remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of ELD and PBDs with mortality and life expectancy in two nationwide cohorts. Participants from the UK Biobank and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2003-2018) were included. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-h dietary recalls. The ELD index (ELD-I), overall PBD index (PDI), healthful PBD index (hPDI), and unhealthful PBD index (uPDI) were calculated and categorized into tertiles. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, and life expectancy. After full adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality when comparing the highest versus lowest tertiles was 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.92) for ELD-I, 0.88 (0.83-0.93) for PDI, 0.90 (0.85-0.95) for hPDI, and 1.14 (1.02-1.21) for uPDI in the UK Biobank; equivalent HRs in the US NHANES were 0.71 (0.65-0.78), 0.71 (0.64-0.78), 0.83 (0.73-0.94), and 1.44 (1.32-1.57), respectively. In both cohorts, PDI was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease mortality, while ELD-I showed inverse associations with cancer mortality and respiratory disease mortality. At age 45 years, participants with higher adherence to the ELD-I and PDI had an average increase in life expectancy of 2.07 to 4.31 years and 1.33 to 3.90 years, respectively. These findings demonstrated that greater adherence to ELD and overall PBD was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and longer life expectancy across diverse populations, highlighting the significant benefits of these environmentally friendly diets for human longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41811621What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.