Evidence mapPaperPMID 41811630Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

How direct healthcare professional communications are operationalised by general practitioners and community pharmacists in Ireland: a national cross sectional study.

Paul E Ryan, Ann Sinéad Doherty, Darren L Dahly, Stephen Byrne, Sinead Curran, Darren Scully, Ruchika Sharma, Emma Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul E RyanDepartment of General Practice, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Paul_ryan@ucc.ie.
Ann Sinéad DohertyDepartment of General Practice, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Darren L DahlyHRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Stephen ByrneSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Sinead CurranHealth Products Regulatory Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Darren ScullyHealth Products Regulatory Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Ruchika SharmaHealth Products Regulatory Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Emma WallaceDepartment of General Practice, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

Health Service Executive (HSE) National Doctors Training Programme (NDTP) General Practice Academic Clinical Fellowship Programme 2022 R21492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDirect Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) alert healthcare professionals of important safety information relating to medication(s) and of the need to adapt practices with respect to these. International evidence suggests that their implementation varies in clinical practice. To date, few studies have examined implementation of DHPCs in primary care.

aimTo examine how general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists implement DHPCs in Ireland and their preferences for receiving medication safety updates.

methodA national cross-sectional survey of GPs and pharmacists in collaboration with the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), was conducted in June 2024. GPs and CPs were invited to participate via national gatekeepers (Irish College of GPs, Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland). Following piloting, the questionnaire were administered via email using Qualtrics. Data was analysed using R and R Studio.

resultsA total of 277 GPs and 219 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, a response rate of 6% and 8% respectively. Most GPs (n = 227, 82%) and pharmacists (n = 196, 89%) reported DHPCs as their preferred source of medication safety updates. Practice protocols for sharing DPHCs once received differed across the two professional groups. For example, DHPCs were more likely to be disseminated and discussed at a pharmacy practice meeting (n = 64 pharmacists, 29%) compared with GP practice meetings (n = 24 GPs, 9%). More than one-third of GPs (n = 98, 35%) identified time constraints as the most important barrier to DHPC implementation, followed by absence of prescribing notifications on patient electronic health records (EHRs), n = 36 GPs (13%), n = 39 CPs (18%). A total of 257 GPs (93%) and 198 CPs (90%) identified patient EHR prescribing alerts, aligned with DHPC recommendations, integrated at the point of patient care as a preferred way to support implementation.

conclusionSurveyed GPs and pharmacists use DHPCs as their primary information source for new medication safety alerts and most reported these communications as very useful. Repeated DHPC communications across different modalities were valued. Barriers to implementation included time constraints and lack of point of care alerts for both GPs and pharmacists. Remote clinical support is acceptable to GPs and pharmacists and may support the implementation of DHPC recommendations to optimise medication safety in primary care.

Indexed as

CommunicationGeneral PractitionersPharmacistsCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIrelandMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity pharmacyMedication safetyRegulatory communications

Identifiers

PMID41811630
PMCPMC13369712

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.