ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Dynamics of the formation of flat clathrin lattices in response to growth factor stimulus.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clathrin assemblies on the cell membrane are critical for endocytosis and signal transduction in cells. Specifically, the Ω-shaped clathrin assembly functions as the coat of endocytic vesicles, while the flat clathrin assembly, also known as the flat clathrin lattice (FCL), serves as a signaling hub for various pathways. Multiple flat clathrin lattices exist on the cell membrane, and these lattices grow after epidermal growth factor stimulation (EGF) and then return to baseline. In this work, we used a particle-based model to simulate the assembly and disassembly of flat clathrin lattices to capture these dynamics. We found that the formation of flat clathrin lattices is highly dynamic, that is, cluster number, size and dwelling time often change even in the absence of any stimulus. Moreover, these key features are affected by adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) number, clathrin-clathrin binding rate, and clathrin diffusion coefficient. Specifically, an increase in AP-2 number leads to the transition from no cluster, short-lived multiple small clusters, to a long-lasting single giant cluster. An increased clathrin-clathrin binding rate or decreased clathrin diffusion coefficient both result in an increased cluster number, reduced cluster size, and shortened dwelling time. Furthermore, we also predicted that under EGF stimulation, simultaneous changes in the AP-2 number, the clathrin-clathrin binding rate, and the clathrin diffusion coefficient can reproduce the experimentally observed trend of FCLs: an increase in cluster number and size in the first 30 minutes, followed by a decrease after 30 minutes. These findings reveal kinetic mechanisms underlying the formation of multiple FCLs and how EGF regulates FCL dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.