ArticleOncology nursing forum2026
Investigation of a Mobile, Digital Application to Objectively Assess Cognitive Function in Cancer Survivors.
Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo demonstrate feasibility of the MindCap mobile, digital application for objective and repeated assessment of cognitive function in cancer survivors and assess its sensitivity to cognitive improvement. SAMPLE &
setting57 adults with stage I-III solid tumors or lymphoma who reported cognitive issues six months to five years postchemotherapy. METHODS & VARIABLES: Participants completed three phases of MindCap testing sessions over 14 weeks. Pre-/postintervention data were collected for time and number of MindCap sessions completed for each phase, adherence to required testing frequency, participant satisfaction, self-report, and MindCap metrics for cognitive domain-specific performance (executive function, attention, memory, verbal ability, visual-spatial ability, and psychomotor function).
resultsFeasibility was demonstrated for recruitment and adherence to MindCap use. Self-report and MindCap metrics correlated positively. MindCap performance metrics were sensitive to improvements in multiple cognitive domains. Post facto analyses indicated a potential MindCap dose effect for cognitive function improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Future research comparing MindCap metrics to standard neurocognitive testing and investigation for potential dose effect are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.