Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41812051›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Methane profiles assessment in growing Simmental bulls with divergent feed efficiency.

Matteo Braidot, Anita Cabbia, Mauro Spanghero, Damiano Cavallini, Alberto Romanzin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo BraidotDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine (UD), 33100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-7432
Anita CabbiaDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine (UD), 33100, Italy.
Mauro SpangheroDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine (UD), 33100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9782-8194
Damiano CavalliniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO), 40064, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-6722
Alberto RomanzinDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine (UD), 33100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9750-0607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a considerable interest in animal genetic selection to reduce the livestock sector's environmental impact, representing a permanent mitigation strategy. The methane (CH4) total production was correlated to animal efficiency in different studies on dairy cows and steers. Several methods for CH4 quantification have been proposed, such as the laser methane detector (LMD), a reliable, cheap and easy alternative to gold standard methods when CH4 is assessed in vivo. The aim of this study was to characterize the CH4 profile of growing Simmental bulls collected using an LMD and to relate the CH4 production, as total or expressed in different ways, with the feed efficiency. For this purpose, 1,164 CH4 profiles collected from 194 Italian Simmental bulls were analyzed to evaluate their main characteristics as peak type, number, and intensity. Subjects were divided into two feed efficiency groups, high (n = 50) and low (n = 49) efficiency, based on their residual feed intake (RFI), and the main traits of CH4 production were compared. The total number of peaks observed did not differ between the two groups, with a similar average concentration (51.9 ppm-m). Likewise, the eructation peaks had shown a similar trend with no differences detected in total number and concentration. The CH4 profile converted to g/day has shown similar values between groups. Instead, the CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) was higher in highly efficient animals when compared to low-efficient animals (30.4 vs. 25.3 g/kg). Similarly, the residual methane emission (RME), calculated as the difference between the measured CH4 and that estimated, was higher in the high efficiency group (74.7 vs. 35.7 g/day). Contrary to the common idea that efficient animals produce less CH4, results indicate that total production may be similar across animals with different RFI. Instead, values could be unfavorable for highly efficient animals when CH4 yield or RME are considered.

Indexed as

MethaneAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietMaleMethaneenteric methanelaser methane smartresidual feed intakeresidual methane emissionSimmental breed

Identifiers

PMID41812051
PMCPMC13185149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.