SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Definitions of early COPD and predictors for disease progression: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered to represent the initial phase of the disease. However, inconsistent terminology and lack of standardised definitions hinders research and clinical application. This systematic review examined clinical research on early COPD, analysed terms and definitions used, and evaluated predictors of disease progression. This serves as a platform to reach consensus and direct future research to target early disease states and improve patient outcomes.
methodsUtilising a standardised protocol, we systematically screened all clinical studies on early COPD. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and compared against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stage 1 assessed terminology and definitions and stage 2 evaluated predictors of progression. Two independent people reviewed studies at each stage. Study quality was appraised using a modified Downs and Black checklist.
resultsWe identified 4871 articles, 1759 were screened after duplicate removal. The terms used included PRISm (preserved ratio impaired spirometry) (104 articles), GOLD 0 (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 0) (63), early COPD (37), at-risk COPD (35) and pre-COPD (30). Definitions were heterogeneous and proposed early COPD definitions were not routinely used. Stage 2 included 43 full-text articles from cohort studies, of which 93% were of good quality. Predictors of progression included age (n=13 articles), smoking history (12), symptoms (12), exacerbations (one), lung function measures (20), computed tomography metrics (14), risk tools (three) and machine learning approaches (three).
conclusionWe demonstrate an urgent need for consensus on clinically applicable definitions of the early disease course of COPD, prior to diagnosis. We highlight predictors of progression; these need validation to enable stratification of individuals early in their disease trajectory for targeted management to halt or modify progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.