Evidence mapPaperPMID 41813052Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2026

Effectiveness of a web-based preventive postpartum depression programme in pregnancy, with/without telephone support: a randomised control trial.

Tatiana Dessy, Tina C Montreuil, Martin St-André, Catherine M Herba, Anna L MacKinnon, Myriam Clément, Isabelle Boucoiran, Camille Dinello-Goupil, Julie Béland, Valérie Samson and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110456 (Starting Before Birth to Prevent Maternal Mental Health Problems), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05110456 nacompletednot on this map

Starting Before Birth to Prevent Maternal Mental Health Problems: "Parents and Babies" Program (Programme "Toi, Moi, Bébé")

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Justine's HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled510ConditionsDepression, PostpartumArmsTelephone support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tatiana DessyDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-0530
Tina C MontreuilDepartment of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-1216
Martin St-AndréDepartment of Psychiatry, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Catherine M HerbaCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Anna L MacKinnonCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-2048
Myriam ClémentDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Isabelle BoucoiranCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-6024
Camille Dinello-GoupilCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Julie BélandUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Valérie SamsonDepartment of Nursing, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Gillis-Delmas Tchouangue-DinkouCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Anick BérardCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4391-5166
Lucie MorinDepartment of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Lila AmiraliCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Cindy-Lee DennisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-7647
Benoît MâsseDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sylvana M CôtéDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada sylvana.cote.1@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based secondary prevention programme for postpartum depression, delivered with or without telephone support, compared with usual care.

designWe first conducted a randomised controlled superiority trial to test whether the web-based Parents and Babies programme (Toi, Moi, Bébé; TMB) delivered with motivational telephone support (ie, coaching) was superior to the fully automated programme (ie, self-help). TMB incorporated classic and third-wave cognitive-behavioural therapy components and psychoeducation. Then, we tested whether TMB (both treatment modalities combined) was superior to usual care. The usual care comparison group was drawn from the CONCEPTION prospective pan-Canadian perinatal cohort (N=592).

settingA remote study based at Sainte-Justine Hospital Centre, Quebec, Canada.

participantsWeb-based intervention programme participants were women aged ≥14 years at 12-25 weeks' gestation, with subclinical to moderate clinical Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores: 9-16. Exclusion criteria were psychosis and self-reported substance abuse. The usual care comparison group was pregnant women ≥18 years old. All participants were living in Canada at study inception.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was EPDS scores at 3 months post partum, accounting for baseline EPDS scores and depression events defined as EPDS ≥13 at 3 months post partum. The secondary outcomes were EPDS scores at 6 months post partum, depression events (EPDS≥13) at 6 months post partum, anxiety symptoms (Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, GAD-7) at 3 and 6 months post partum, accounting for baseline scores for the continuous outcomes; as well as the number of completed intervention modules and well-being scores (WHO 5-Item Well-being Index) at 3 months post partum.

resultsWe randomised 510 participants to TMB self-help (n=255) or TMB with coaching (n=255); 211 and 214 participants, respectively, were included in the complete-case intention-to-treat analyses. At baseline, 91% lived with a partner, 71% were university graduates and 42% self-reported GAD-7≥10. Randomisation was successful. First, TMB with coaching was not superior to TMB self-help: at 3 months post partum, EPDS scores were TMB self-help (mean 8.0±4.3) vs TMB with coaching (mean 8.6±4.5); effect size was 0.01 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03; p=0.16). Second, TMB (regardless of intervention arm) was superior to usual care: in adjusted regression models, EPDS scores were 6.2 units lower (per SD, 95% CI -8.2 to -4.3) in TMB (both treatment modalities combined) than in usual care; and proportions of depression events were 4.7 units lower (per SD on the logit scale, 95% CI -6.6 to -2.7) in TMB (combined) than in usual care. No other group differences were observed.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that, in women with subclinical to moderate clinical antenatal depressive symptoms, receiving a web-based cognitive-behavioural therapy-based programme in addition to usual care can reduce depression postnatally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05110456.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepression, PostpartumInternet-Based InterventionTelephoneAdultFemaleHumansInternetPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuebecTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDepression & mood disordersMENTAL HEALTHPregnant WomenPsychosocial Intervention

Identifiers

PMID41813052
PMCPMC12983831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.