ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Design and Performance of an Email-Based Patient Recruitment Campaign in Primary Care Research: Formative Secondary Analysis.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recruiting patients in primary care research remains challenging due to clinical workload, staffing constraints, and the need to limit disruption to routine care. Traditional recruitment methods often place a substantial burden on clinics, prompting research teams to adopt low-burden and scalable approaches such as email-based recruitment. Despite its growing use, limited empirical evidence describes how email recruitment campaigns are designed and how they perform when targeting primary care patients in real-world settings. Objective: This study aims to descriptively examine engagement metrics from an email recruitment campaign targeting primary care patients. Methods: We conducted a formative, descriptive secondary analysis of engagement metrics generated during a large-scale email recruitment campaign conducted as part of the Quebec component of the Patient-Reported Indicator Survey-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development survey. Between June 2023 and January 2024, a total of 12 primary care clinics invited eligible adult patients (aged ≥45 years) to complete an online survey using a standardized email template distributed via an email marketing platform. Collected engagement metrics included delivery rates, open rates, click-through rates, conversion rates, and device type. Analyses were descriptive and conducted at the clinic level. Results: For 15,277 patients, invitations were successfully delivered to 14,758 (96.6%). The mean open rate for the initial invitation was 73.4% (10,828/14,757; range 57%-88%), decreasing with reminders. Most emails were opened on computers (25,868/30,279, 85.4%). Out of a total of 445 emails, 42 (9.4%) were undelivered due to technical issues, and 403 (90.6%) were undelivered due to incorrect email addresses. The overall conversion rate was 9.7% (1430/14,758). Click-through rates varied by content, with the highest engagement observed for the survey link and lower engagement for supplementary video materials. Reminder emails substantially increased survey participation across clinics (759/1138, 66.7%). Participants who completed the questionnaire were predominantly aged 60 to 69 years, identified as female, and had completed postsecondary education. Conclusions: This formative analysis suggests that email-based recruitment is a feasible and low-burden approach for engaging primary care patients in research. Engagement metrics offer valuable insights at the implementation level to inform the design, adaptation, and monitoring of digital recruitment strategies in real-world primary care settings. These findings provide practical, implementation-oriented insights to inform the design, refinement, and evaluation of email recruitment campaigns in primary care research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.