Evidence mapPaperPMID 41813166Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Design and Performance of an Email-Based Patient Recruitment Campaign in Primary Care Research: Formative Secondary Analysis.

Vanessa T Vaillancourt, Marie-Dominique Poirier, Amélie Fournier, Sabrina T Wong, Marie-Eve Poitras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vanessa T VaillancourtDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12 Ave N Immeuble X1, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada, 1 4185415050 ext 203239.ORCID 0000-0002-9187-2300
Marie-Dominique PoirierDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12 Ave N Immeuble X1, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada, 1 4185415050 ext 203239.ORCID 0009-0001-8961-576X
Amélie FournierDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12 Ave N Immeuble X1, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada, 1 4185415050 ext 203239.ORCID 0009-0009-7642-7901
Sabrina T WongApplied Science and Medicine, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9619-9012
Marie-Eve PoitrasDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12 Ave N Immeuble X1, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada, 1 4185415050 ext 203239.ORCID 0000-0002-3315-0190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recruiting patients in primary care research remains challenging due to clinical workload, staffing constraints, and the need to limit disruption to routine care. Traditional recruitment methods often place a substantial burden on clinics, prompting research teams to adopt low-burden and scalable approaches such as email-based recruitment. Despite its growing use, limited empirical evidence describes how email recruitment campaigns are designed and how they perform when targeting primary care patients in real-world settings. Objective: This study aims to descriptively examine engagement metrics from an email recruitment campaign targeting primary care patients. Methods: We conducted a formative, descriptive secondary analysis of engagement metrics generated during a large-scale email recruitment campaign conducted as part of the Quebec component of the Patient-Reported Indicator Survey-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development survey. Between June 2023 and January 2024, a total of 12 primary care clinics invited eligible adult patients (aged ≥45 years) to complete an online survey using a standardized email template distributed via an email marketing platform. Collected engagement metrics included delivery rates, open rates, click-through rates, conversion rates, and device type. Analyses were descriptive and conducted at the clinic level. Results: For 15,277 patients, invitations were successfully delivered to 14,758 (96.6%). The mean open rate for the initial invitation was 73.4% (10,828/14,757; range 57%-88%), decreasing with reminders. Most emails were opened on computers (25,868/30,279, 85.4%). Out of a total of 445 emails, 42 (9.4%) were undelivered due to technical issues, and 403 (90.6%) were undelivered due to incorrect email addresses. The overall conversion rate was 9.7% (1430/14,758). Click-through rates varied by content, with the highest engagement observed for the survey link and lower engagement for supplementary video materials. Reminder emails substantially increased survey participation across clinics (759/1138, 66.7%). Participants who completed the questionnaire were predominantly aged 60 to 69 years, identified as female, and had completed postsecondary education. Conclusions: This formative analysis suggests that email-based recruitment is a feasible and low-burden approach for engaging primary care patients in research. Engagement metrics offer valuable insights at the implementation level to inform the design, adaptation, and monitoring of digital recruitment strategies in real-world primary care settings. These findings provide practical, implementation-oriented insights to inform the design, refinement, and evaluation of email recruitment campaigns in primary care research.

Indexed as

Electronic MailPatient SelectionPrimary Health CareAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuebecSurveys and Questionnairesemail-based recruitmentengagement metricspatient recruitmentprimary careweb-based survey

Identifiers

PMID41813166
PMCPMC12978913

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.