ArticleScientific reports2026
Identifying intact and fibrotic parenchyma in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas using compression optical coherence elastography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intraoperative assessment of the condition of pancreatic tissue, including identification of “soft” pancreatic parenchyma and areas of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are important for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs), a predictor of the likely success of pancreatic islet isolation for transplantation, and for determining accurate resection margins in case of PDAC. The aim of this study was to analyze pancreatic stiffness using compression optical coherence elastography (C-OCE) to differentiate intact from fibrotic parenchyma and to determine the resection margins of PDAC. A total of 35 freshly excised human pancreatic specimens containing PDACs together with some of the surrounding non-tumorous pancreatic tissue derived from pancreatectomies were studied. In our investigation, calculation of the stiffness (Young’s modulus, kPa) and its color-coded 2D distribution were performed for different pancreatic tissues using C-OCE. The accuracy of the resulting data was confirmed by histological studies. The palpation stiffness of the pancreatic parenchyma was also qualitatively evaluated intraoperatively by the surgeon. Stiffness values were compared between POPF positive and negative groups. It has been shown that C-OCE can be used to differentiate various tissue types in pancreatic specimens (such as adipose tissue, acinar tissue, connective tissue, pancreatic cancer, and islets of Langerhans) and to objectively distinguish intact pancreatic parenchyma from fibrotic tissue based on quantitative stiffness assessment (p < 0.0001). A high negative correlation was observed between the percentage of acinar tissue present, determined using histological examination, and the average stiffness of the specimens, based on C-OCE data (r = -0.86; p < 0.0001). It was found that, when using a C-OCE value of < 84 kPa as the cutoff for pancreatic parenchymal stiffness to predict POPF, the sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 95%, respectively. Furthermore, our study is the first time that C-OCE technology has been demonstrated accurately to visualize the transition zone between PDAC and the surrounding non-tumorous tissues both after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and without. Therefore, the present study provides a new approach to the further rapid and objective in-traoperative assessment of the status of pancreatic parenchyma in patients, based on calculation of its stiffness using real time C-OCE data enabling improved differentiation of ‘soft’ pancreatic parenchyma from ‘hard’, as well as areas of PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.