ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2026
'Missing' disease-causing variants in Alport syndrome.
Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autosomal Dominant Alport Syndrome.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to 20% of people with clinically suspected Alport syndrome do not have a disease-causing variant identified with genetic testing. Disease-causing changes are 'missing' because the identified variant is of uncertain significance or no suspicious change has been found. A variant of uncertain significance might be resolved after a clinician-laboratory consultation, family segregation studies, functional assays, evidence from large case-control cohorts or review after further genetic and experimental information becomes available. Other explanations for a lack of disease-causing variants include the presence of phenocopies such as IgA nephropathy, technical issues associated with whole-exome sequencing and difficulties in identifying and computationally assessing non-canonical splicing variants, including deep intronic and synonymous changes. Candidate splicing variants might be identified using whole-exome, whole-genome or long-read sequencing, prioritized bioinformatically, and validated with targeted RNA sequencing or splicing assays. People with suspected Alport syndrome but no identified disease-causing variant should be managed as for Alport syndrome while awaiting confirmation of their diagnosis. Missing disease-causing variants are also common in other genetic kidney diseases, and the methods used for their resolution are the same. Our current inability to detect all disease-causing variants means that the contribution of genetic disease is underestimated for kidney phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41813856What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.