Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814013›Full record

ArticlePituitary2026

Cytokeratin 5.2 expression as a predictive marker of outcome in patients with acromegaly following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

Vaishali Kaur, Rahul Gupta, Diya Roy, Ashutosh Rai, Apinderpreet Singh, Chirag K Ahuja, Rajesh Chhabra, Debajyoti Chatterjee, Sanja Medenica, Pinaki Dutta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vaishali KaurDepartment of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. vaishali19xx@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3029-4544
Rahul GuptaDepartment of Endocrinology, AIIMS, Bhopal, India. rahul.endo@aiimsbhopal.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-8739
Diya RoyDepartment of Histopathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. doc.royd1991@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-5288
Ashutosh RaiDepartment of Biochemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. raiashutosh28@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3762
Apinderpreet SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. apinderpreetsingh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6310-946X
Chirag K AhujaDepartment of Radio- diagnosis, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. chirahkahuja@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0734-3252
Rajesh ChhabraDepartment of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. drrajeshchhabra@gmail.com.
Debajyoti ChatterjeeDepartment of Histopathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-2598
Sanja MedenicaDepartment of Endocrinology, Internal Medicine Clinic, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro. medenicasanja@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-3033
Pinaki DuttaDepartment of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. drpinakidutta12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-1611

Funding

ESI, India IEC-INT/2022/PhD-811Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 33059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to characterize clinico-radiological differences and their impact on post-surgical outcomes in histological subtypes of somatotroph adenomas (SA): densely granulated (DGSA) and sparsely granulated (SGSA).

methodsA single-centre study in individuals with SA from 2015 to 2024, where preoperative clinical, hormonal, and magnetic resonance imaging parameters were collected, and biochemical and radiological disease control were assessed postoperatively.

resultsOf 116 SA, 45(38.8%) and 71(61.2%) were DGSA and SGSA, respectively. The median (IQR) age at presentation was 35.0 (29.0–44.0) years, 56.9% were females, 92.2% had macroadenoma, and the mean tumour diameter was 24.9 ± 10.3 mm. The pre-operative nadir GH on OGTT [median (IQR)] was 31.1 (16.7–50.0) ng/mL, and IGF-1 was 3.7 ± 1.5 times the upper limit of normal. As compared to DGSA, SGSA presented earlier [40.0 vs. 33.5 years; p = 0.009], had larger tumor size [ 2239.4 mm3 vs. 5221.6 mm3; p = 0.005], were more invasive [ 33.3% vs. 54.1%; p = 0.038], proliferative [ki-67 Index 1.0% vs. 3.0%; p < 0.001], and had higher SSTR5 expression [H score 30.0 vs. 80.0; p = 0.006]. The post-surgical radiological [19.4% vs. 22.8%; p = 0.707 (NS)] and biochemical [17.2% vs. 32.2%; p = 0.727(NS)] disease control rates were similar in both groups.

conclusionIn comparison to DGSA, SGSA presents a decade earlier, are larger in size, more invasive, exhibits higher proliferation, and SSTR5 expression. However, this does not impact post-surgical biochemical and radiological disease control.

Indexed as

AcromegalyGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaAdenomaAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTreatment OutcomeAcromegalyDensely granulated somatotroph adenomaSomatotroph adenomaSparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.