ArticlePituitary2026
Cytokeratin 5.2 expression as a predictive marker of outcome in patients with acromegaly following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.
Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to characterize clinico-radiological differences and their impact on post-surgical outcomes in histological subtypes of somatotroph adenomas (SA): densely granulated (DGSA) and sparsely granulated (SGSA).
methodsA single-centre study in individuals with SA from 2015 to 2024, where preoperative clinical, hormonal, and magnetic resonance imaging parameters were collected, and biochemical and radiological disease control were assessed postoperatively.
resultsOf 116 SA, 45(38.8%) and 71(61.2%) were DGSA and SGSA, respectively. The median (IQR) age at presentation was 35.0 (29.0–44.0) years, 56.9% were females, 92.2% had macroadenoma, and the mean tumour diameter was 24.9 ± 10.3 mm. The pre-operative nadir GH on OGTT [median (IQR)] was 31.1 (16.7–50.0) ng/mL, and IGF-1 was 3.7 ± 1.5 times the upper limit of normal. As compared to DGSA, SGSA presented earlier [40.0 vs. 33.5 years; p = 0.009], had larger tumor size [ 2239.4 mm3 vs. 5221.6 mm3; p = 0.005], were more invasive [ 33.3% vs. 54.1%; p = 0.038], proliferative [ki-67 Index 1.0% vs. 3.0%; p < 0.001], and had higher SSTR5 expression [H score 30.0 vs. 80.0; p = 0.006]. The post-surgical radiological [19.4% vs. 22.8%; p = 0.707 (NS)] and biochemical [17.2% vs. 32.2%; p = 0.727(NS)] disease control rates were similar in both groups.
conclusionIn comparison to DGSA, SGSA presents a decade earlier, are larger in size, more invasive, exhibits higher proliferation, and SSTR5 expression. However, this does not impact post-surgical biochemical and radiological disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41814013What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.