Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814284›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Using the Person-based Approach to plan and develop an intervention for healthcare professionals to facilitate family-centred conversations when an adult patient has a serious illness.

Elizabeth Rapa, Jeffrey R Hanna, Sophie Ratcliffe, Rob Hallifax, Jack Arthey, Louise J Dalton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth RapaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jeffrey R HannaSchool of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast, UK.
Sophie RatcliffeFaculty of English, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rob HallifaxCentre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Jack ArtheyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Louise J DaltonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Louise.Dalton@psych.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR203178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEveryday thousands of adults across the world are diagnosed with serious health conditions. Many will have important relationships with children in their role as parents or grandparents. Communicating effectively with children about parental illness is associated with better psychological outcomes for children and family functioning. Adult patients report wanting help from healthcare professionals (HCPs) to think about sharing their diagnosis with children. HCPs describe feeling uncertain and unskilled in asking patients about their relationships with children; consequently support for patients is often absent.

aimsPlan and develop an intervention to enhance HCPs’ knowledge, skills and confidence about initiating family-centred conversations when an adult patient has a serious illness.

methodsThe research used the Person-based Approach. Phase one: (1) Focus groups with adults with experience of their own or a partner’s illness and have a relationship with children (n = 12); (2) Focus groups with adults with lived-childhood experience of an adult’s illness (n = 6); (3) Individual interviews with professionals with a role in HCP training in a UK NHS setting (n = 9); (4) Focus groups with HCPs with experience of working in a UK NHS setting with adult patients who have an illness (n = 10). Phase two: ‘Think-aloud’ individual interviews with (1) adults with experience of their own or a partner’s illness (n = 2); (2) adults with lived-childhood experience (n = 2); (3) child with lived-experience (n = 1); (4) HCPs (n = 4). Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed.

resultsPhase one: data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify the content for the intervention. Findings were triangulated and used to develop guiding principles and logic model to inform development of the draft intervention. The format selected was an animation. Phase two: Data were collected through 3 cycles with changes made to the audio, speed and visuals of the draft animation.

conclusionsThe Person-based Approach facilitated the inclusion of multiple perspectives from different stakeholders. This extensive and rigorous process resulted in the development of an intervention in the form of an animation; evaluation is now required to assess the extent to which the animation increases HCPs’ knowledge, skills and confidence to initiate family-centred conversations with adult patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelProfessional-Family RelationsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareUnited KingdomChildrenCommunicationFamily-centred conversationsHealthcare professionalsSerious illness

Identifiers

PMID41814284
PMCPMC13104269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.