ArticleOncoimmunology2026
Polarization of tumor-infiltrating macrophages predicts complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing the composition of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) has shown promise in understanding variable responses to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Despite this, no method has been established that can confidently predict the response to pre-operative chemoradiotherapy. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the TME can be polarized by the biochemical milieu to adopt pro-inflammatory (M1-like) and anti-inflammatory (M2-like) phenotypes. Utilizing the spectrum of TAM polarization as a biomarker to predict patient response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer patients has not been fully explored. We address this using 7-plex immunofluorescence staining to quantify 16 subsets of TAMs in rectal adenocarcinoma pretreatment biopsies. Pretreatment biopsies were obtained from 128 patients with known tumor regression grades (TRG). Through quantifying the prevalence of TAM subsets, we identified a higher density of the completely M1-polarized subset and a lower density of the completely M2-polarized subset in patients with a complete pathological response, the absence of detectable tumor cells following treatment. Predictive modeling using TAM subsets showed that only the densities of two completely polarized subsets were predictors of therapeutic response in patients with rectal cancer. Significantly, we demonstrate that the full panel of markers we employed were required to define predictive populations, as total TAMs or TAM subsets defined by fewer markers were incapable of predicting treatment response. Taken together, we validate the utility of a multiplex approach to define the spectrum of TAM polarization, which can be leveraged to identify patients that will have a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.