ArticleRevue medicale de Liege2026
[SURPASS CVOT : cardiovascular benefits with tirzepatide versus dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes].
Article in Revue medicale de Liege, 2026. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 2. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Several secondary end points tended to favour tirzepatide versus dulaglutide, among which a reduction in the incidence of all-cause deaths after four years of median follow-up (HR 0.84 ; 95 % CI 0.75 to 0.94; exploratory analysis).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×all-cause mortality
SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →2 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
GLP-1 receptor agonists×all-cause mortality
SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →11 readable studies in this cell: 7 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
Several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have proven their ability to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among at-risk patients living with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, demonstrated a better control of hyperglycaemia, body weight and several cardiovascular risk factors than pure GLP-1RAs (including semaglutide) in dedicated studies of the SURPASS programme. SURPASS CVOT has the primary objective to demonstrate, in a population with T2D and atheromatous cardiovascular disease, the non-inferiority of tirzepatide regarding both efficacy and safety compared with dulaglutide, a selective GLP-RA that has already proven a significant reduction in MACEs versus placebo in the REWIND trial. Non-inferiority was met in SURPASS CVOT (p = 0.003), but not superiority of tirzepatide compared to dulaglutide (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95 % confidence interval [IC] 0.83 to 1.01; P = 0.09) regarding the primary end point (reduction in MACEs). Several secondary end points tended to favour tirzepatide versus dulaglutide, among which a reduction in the incidence of all-cause deaths after four years of median follow-up (HR 0.84 ; 95 % CI 0.75 to 0.94; exploratory analysis). SURPASS CVOT, the first and unique study that used an active comparator rather than a placebo, confirms the efficacy and safety of the dual agonist tirzepatide in patients with T2D and atheromatous cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41815032What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.