ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
The value of an integrated multi-omics model in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, multi-omics models based on a variety of biomarkers have been continuously developed and increasingly applied in the field of oncology, especially in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. This study aimed to integrate computed tomography (CT) radiomics with seven lung cancer-associated autoantibodies (AABs) to develop multi-omics predictive models for pulmonary nodule (PN) characterization. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 179 patients with PNs measuring from 5 to 30 mm in diameter who underwent thoracic surgery at Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University between January 2020 and December 2024. The patients were pathologically categorized into lung cancer (n=87) and non-lung cancer (n=92) groups, and then randomly allocated into training and test sets at a ratio of 7 to 3. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature screening to construct a clinical model based on five clinical characteristics. A radiomics prediction model was constructed based on the radiomics features identified after delineating the regions of interest and extracting the radiomics features; the rad-score for each patient was calculated to develop a multi-analytic comprehensive model by combining different markers. The diagnostic performances of the models were compared using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value. Results: The multi-omics model demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.902 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.817-0.986], accuracy of 82.4%, sensitivity of 88.5%, and specificity of 80.0%, outperforming the clinical (AUC =0.848; 95% CI: 0.777-0.919) and radiomics (AUC =0.854; 95% CI: 0.786-0.922) models. Notably, the radiomics model exhibited high sensitivity (96.6%) but poor specificity (63.6%), while the multi-omics model resolved this trade-off via the synergistic integration of clinical-radiomic-biomarker features, achieving significant improvements in the PPV (81.5% Conclusions: Integrating CT radiomics with seven lung cancer-AABs established a robust multi-omics framework for PN diagnosis. Compared to the standalone clinical or radiomics models, this comprehensive model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.