ArticleAsian journal of urology2026
Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumors using two distinct surgical approaches: A tertiary care experience.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-PC-RPLND) is increasingly used as an alternative to open surgery for metastatic testicular cancer. This study aimed to summarize the experience with lateral and supine approaches in R-PC-RPLND for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumors, applied based on different clinical indications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive patients who underwent R-PC-RPLND at our tertiary cancer center from May 2016 to July 2023. Patients were categorized based on the surgical approach used: lateral position (28 patients) or supine position (14 patients). Data on perioperative outcomes, complications, and oncological efficacy were assessed and reported using descriptive statistics. Results: The median patient age was 28.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 23.5-30.5) years, and the median body mass index was 22.7 (IQR: 19.9-24.2) kg/m Conclusion: Both lateral and supine approaches for R-PC-RPLND demonstrated favorable surgical and oncological outcomes, with acceptable operative times, minimal blood loss, low complication rates, and effective oncological control. The choice between these approaches should consider patient-specific factors and surgeon expertise, allowing for tailored treatment that optimizes outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.