Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Development and internal validation of a therapeutic effect predictive model for myofascial pain syndrome.

Xiumei Zhu, Wanquan Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiumei ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guannan County First People's Hospital, Lianyungang, China.
Wanquan ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guannan County First People's Hospital, Lianyungang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) is a common chronic pain disorder, and there are significant individual differences in its clinical efficacy. Currently, there is a lack of reliable prediction tools to guide individualized treatment decisions. This study aimed to construct and validate a prediction model based on clinical and biomarker data to evaluate the responses of MPS patients to different treatment regimens and optimize treatment strategies. Methods: A total of 340 MPS patients was retrospectively enrolled and randomly split into a training set ( Results: The final model included 6 key predictive factors (including disease duration, baseline pain intensity, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression score, pain catastrophizing score, interleukin-6, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels). The AUC value of the support vector machine model reached 895 (95%CI: 0.840-0.950) in the training set and remained at a relatively high level of 0.873(95%CI: 0.794-0.953) in the validation set, and the calibration was good (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Conclusion: A MPS efficacy prediction model, which had good internal predictive efficacy and interpretability, integrating clinical, psychological and inflammatory indicators was successfully constructed and internally validated. In the future, multi-center external validation and model optimization are needed to further improve its clinical applicability and promotion value.

Indexed as

efficacy evaluationindividualized treatmentmachine learningmyofascial pain syndromeprediction model

Identifiers

PMID41815725
PMCPMC12971686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.