ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Efficacy and safety of Tai Chi for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Tai Chi, a form of complementary intervention emphasizing breathing and mind-body connection, is increasingly recognized for its potential in pain management. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the efficacy and safety of Tai Chi for chronic musculoskeletal pain management in adults. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, WoS, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Databases, CENTRAL, and WHO ICTRP were searched from database inception through May 2025, with an additional supplementary search conducted in January 2026. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Tai Chi with other interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain management. The primary outcome was the efficacy of Tai Chi, and secondary outcomes were adverse events associated with Tai Chi for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent authors screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, presenting results with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and Standard Mean Difference (SMD). The certainty of evidence for primary outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criterion approach. Results: Thirty-eight RCTs were included in this review. Compared to control groups, Tai Chi was associated with reduced pain in osteoarthritis [SMD = -0.37, 95% CI (-0.57, -0.16)], low back pain [SMD = -1.43, 95% CI (-2.07, -0.80)], fibromyalgia [SMD = -0.96, 95% CI (-1.96, 0.04)], and other disease [SMD = -1.04, 95% CI (-2.14, 0.06)]. Most interventions lasted 12 weeks, and Yang-style Tai Chi and 24-form Tai Chi were most frequently studied. No serious Tai Chi-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Tai Chi appears to be associated with pain reduction in osteoarthritis and low back pain, while effects in fibromyalgia and other musculoskeletal conditions were non-significant, and no serious adverse events were reported in the included trials. The certainty of evidence is limited by methodological limitations and risk of bias; therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023426431, Identifier CRD42023426431.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.