Evidence mapPaperPMID 41815950Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026

Heterogeneity in clinical appearance of chronic spontaneous urticaria: A cross-sectional analysis of a retrospective cohort.

İlkim Deniz Toprak, Sule Celik Kamaci, Merve Hormet Igde, Pelin Korkmaz, Nevzat Kahveci, Deniz Eyice Karabacak, Osman Ozan Yegit, Derya Unal, Semra Demir, Aslı Gelincik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

İlkim Deniz ToprakDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sule Celik KamaciDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Merve Hormet IgdeDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pelin KorkmazDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nevzat KahveciDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz Eyice KarabacakDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Osman Ozan YegitDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Derya UnalDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Semra DemirDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aslı GelincikDivision of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to analyse the characteristics of subtypes of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and determine the factors that may influence treatment response. Methods: Clinical and laboratory characteristics of CSU patients were compared between 3 groups: (1) those with isolated urticaria (CSUwoAE, n = 50, 27.93%), (2) those with both urticaria and angioedema (CSUwAE, n = 86, 48.04%), and (3) those with isolated angioedema, also referred to as chronic histaminergic angioedema (CHA, n = 43, 24.02%). The Visual Analogue Scale for the worst attack (VAS-WA), Visual Analogue Scale for angioedema control (VAS-AEC), angioedema control test (AECT), Urticaria Control Test (UCT) and Angioedema Quality of Life (AEQoL) were the assessment tools. Results: A weak correlation was observed between disease onset age and BMI (r = 0.295, p < 0.001). The age of onset was higher in CHA than in CSUwAE (p < 0.001). Oropharyngeal angioedema was more frequent in CHA (p = 0.022), whereas eyelid angioedema occurred more often in CSUwAE (p = 0.001). CHA patients had more impaired AEQoL (p = 0.043) and poorer disease control per AECT and VAS-AEC (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). The rate of high-dose antihistamine response among patients with angioedema was lower in the CHA group (n = 1; 12.5%) compared with the CSUwAE group (n = 10; 66.7%; p = 0.027). Irrespective of CSU subtypes, omalizumab response varied by BMI in patients with angioedema (n = 51; p = 0.002), with the least response in obese patients (p = 0.033). Conclusion: Our study observed that obesity appeared to be associated with a later age of CSU onset and with a lower likelihood of omalizumab responsiveness in patients with angioedema; however, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than suggesting any causal relationship. Additionally, CHA patients seem to have more severely impaired quality of life and a less controlled disease compared to CSUwAE.

Indexed as

AngioedemaAntihistaminesObesityOmalizumabUrticaria

Identifiers

PMID41815950
PMCPMC12972524

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.