ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
The use of mHealth technologies to support acceptance and commitment therapy in cancer patients: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies show positive results when acceptance and commitment therapy is used in the treatment of cancer patients. Objectives: To establish the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of common symptoms in cancer patients using trials with an adequate level of control. Methods: Sixty-nine patients affected by different types of cancer (breast, gynecologic, lung, colorectal and ovarian) were recruited and randomly assigned to three experimental conditions defined as follows: the ACT group, the ACT+ACT-ON group, and the waitlist group. Data relating to psychological inflexibility, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic growth as well as quality of life were collected before (T0) and at the end of the intervention (T1). Results: Results showed better outcomes for the two intervention groups, but significant differences were only observed with regard to fatigue (ω2 = .074), where the ACT group obtained lower scores. This group also showed higher scores for post-traumatic growth (ω2 = .066). Similarly, in the quality-of-life subscales, results indicate significantly higher scores for physical role (ω2 = .062) and cognitive function (ω2 = .087), and lower scores for fatigue (ω2 = .118) than in the waitlist group. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that acceptance and commitment therapy is effective in improving relevant aspects such as fatigue, post-traumatic growth and key aspects of quality of life in cancer patients. However, the benefits of using the mobile application need to be confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.