ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
Cardiovascular imaging for the detection of asymptomatic coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Multiple guidelines provide recommendations for assessing future risk of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD). We systematically reviewed current national and international guidelines that include imaging strategies for detecting subclinical CAD. Methods and results: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for relevant guidelines published between January 2010 and December 2025. Major international guideline repositories and medical society websites were also screened. Two reviewers independently screened records assessed methodological rigour using the AGREE II instrument and extracted recommendations. Of four identified guidelines, three met predefined rigour thresholds and were included in the final analysis. Guidelines discouraged coronary artery calcium (CAC) use as a population-wide screening tool or in high-risk individuals. All three guidelines recommended limited use of scoring as a risk modifier in asymptomatic individuals when cardiovascular risk remains uncertain or near treatment thresholds and highlighted its role in shared decision-making. Differences were observed in the target populations for CAC assessment, recommendation strength, and re-screening intervals. Although CAC scoring was the principal imaging modality evaluated, CT coronary angiography was discussed in one guideline but not recommended due to insufficient evidence of clinical benefit. Conclusion: Cardiovascular imaging for the detection of asymptomatic coronary artery disease is not recommended in the guidelines for population screening or in high-risk patients. CAC use is recommended in specific cases such as where patients are near treatment thresholds for primary prevention. Ongoing randomized studies may provide further outcomes and cost effectiveness driven insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.