ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Enhancing vascular wall assessment in computed tomography: image quality optimization via small-field-of-view vascular wall spectral images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spectral computed tomography (CT) vessel wall imaging can clearly visualize vessel wall structures, but its ability to depict fine features is limited. Small field-of-view (FOV) reconstruction technology helps improve image spatial resolution. This study sought to assess the technical efficacy of small-FOV vascular wall spectral imaging in enhancing vascular wall imaging quality compared to conventional normal-FOV imaging. Methods: The data of 52 patients who underwent chest dual-energy CT (DECT) were retrospectively reviewed. Vascular wall spectral images were reconstructed using both small-FOV and normal-FOV protocols. Quantitatively, the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the descending aorta between the vessel wall and periaortic fat/lumen of the small-FOV and normal-FOV groups were calculated and compared. Qualitatively, two radiologists independently evaluated the vessel wall clarity and edge smoothness of both groups. Wall thickness (WT) and descending aortic wall area (DAWA) were measured, and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. These metrics were compared between the small-FOV and normal-FOV reconstruction groups, as well as between the patient groups with and without atherosclerotic risk factors. Results: The small-FOV group had significantly high CNR values than the normal-FOV group (wall-lumen: 9.45±3.28 Conclusions: The small-FOV technique significantly improved the image quality of the vascular wall spectral images, demonstrating clinical potential for detailed vascular assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.