ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Decades of omics in lung cancer research: a bibliometric analysis and visualization from 2004 to 2024.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Omics, encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, plays a pivotal role in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer and advancing precision oncology. While existing studies have primarily focused on the technical development and clinical efficacy of omics applications in cancer, there remains a notable gap in comprehensive assessments of the global research landscape. At different stages of lung cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis, genomics and transcriptomics predominantly reveal oncogenic alterations and dysregulated signaling networks, whereas proteomics and metabolomics capture functional protein dynamics and metabolic reprogramming that drive tumor growth and metastatic adaptation. Importantly, the integration of multi-omics data enables a systematic understanding of the crosstalk between genetic alterations, transcriptional regulation, protein expression, and metabolic remodeling throughout lung cancer evolution. This bibliometric analysis study aims to systematically evaluate scientific output, research trends and hotspots in omics-related lung cancer research. Methods: Relevant publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) from January 1, 2004 to April 27, 2024. Bibliometric analyses and knowledge domain visualizations were conducted using VOSviewer (v1.6.20), CiteSpace (v6.3), R (v4.3.3), and Origin (2024). Results: A total of 19,087 publications were included, demonstrating sustained growth over two decades [2004-2024]. China contributed the largest volume of publications, whereas the USA showed higher citation impact and stronger influence in collaboration networks. Keyword co-occurrence and burst analyses illustrated that "expression", "lung cancer", "gene expression", "tumor microenvironment", "mutation" and "immunotherapy" are dominant and emerging themes. These findings indicate a clear shift from single-omics approaches and gene-centric investigations toward integrative multi-omics frameworks, with increasing emphasis on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immunotherapy. The burst analysis of keywords also highlights the rising prominence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which have emerged as rapidly growing methodological backbones in recent years. Conclusions: Research on omics in lung cancer has rapidly evolved toward integrative, TME-focused and immunotherapy-oriented paradigms, with AI/ML serving as an enabling analytical infrastructure. This study underscores the critical role that omics in facilitating early detection, guiding personalized therapeutic strategies, and improving prognostic accuracy. The findings suggest that enhancing cross-disciplinary collaboration and accelerating the clinical translation of multi-omics data may help overcome current challenges in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.